Task I addresses the design, testing, demonstration, evalua-tion, and
application of concentrating solar power systems, also known as solar
thermal electric systems. This includes parabolic troughs, linear Fresnel
collectors, power towers and dish/engine systems. Through technology
development and market barrier removal, the focus of SolarPACES Task I is
enabling the entry of CSP systems into the commercial market place. The
component development and research efforts of Task III (see Part 5 of this
report) logically feed Task I as new components become parts of new systems.
In return, the results of this Task I provide direction to Task III on new
component needs.
Organization
and Structure:
The Task I Operating Agent is
responsible for organization and reporting of Task I activities. These
are separated into sub sectors, as designated by the Operating Agent and
approved by the Executive Committee. Each sector is coordinated by a
Sector Leader who is appointed by the Operating Agent and is responsible
for coordinating activities within his Sector. Current Sectors are:
-
Central Generation Systems:
includes technology activities primarily associated with large-scale
parabolic trough, linear Fresnel and power tower systems. This sector
is currently led by Mark Mehos of the National Renewable Energy
laboratory in the USA.
-
Distributed Generation Systems:
includes technological activities associated
with dish/engine, and other systems capable of providing power on a
distributed basis like mini-towers and modular schemes for troughs and
Fresnel collectors. The Australian CSIRO currently leads this sector.
-
CSP Market Development:
includes activities addressing financial, regulatory, environmental,
marketing, dissemination and other largely non-technical issues. Task
1.3 focuses on identifying, tracking, and facilitating entry into
emerging markets by the worldwide Concentrating Solar Power industry.
Sandia National Laboratories, USA, leads this sector.
Task activities are cost-shared,
task-shared (either through SolarPACES or between SolarPACES participants),
and/or information-shared. Cost-sharing and task-sharing activities involve
cooperative efforts involving two or more participants where either the cost
of the activities or responsibilities are mutually agreed and shared.
Information sharing is used for the exchange and discussion of results of
projects carried out independently by Participants, but whose results are of
interest to all.
Creation of a Task activity is based on
the request of one or more of the participants and must be approved by the
OA. Each activity has a lead individual designated by the Participants
involved in the activity. The lead individual is responsible for
coordinating the SolarPACES involvement, as well as regular reporting to the
Task I OA.
Deliverables: The OA is responsible for
general Task I reporting, including preparation of input to the IEA/SolarPACES
Annual Report, and for maintaining a Program of Work describing ongoing and
anticipated activities. Participants are responsible for detailed reporting
on their respective activities. General reports (not containing proprietary
information) are available to all Task participants, although the
Participants in an activity may, at their option, limit the distribution of
proprietary information. The activity lead is responsible for providing
information to the OA for general reporting requirements. The OA is
responsible for organizing one to two Task meetings per year to discuss
activity status and progress.
One Task I
meeting was held in 2006 in Seville, Spain in conjunction with the 13th
SolarPACES symposium.
|
|
Status of the Technology:
Concentrating solar power today is
basically represented by four technologies: parabolic troughs, linear
Fresnel reflectors, power towers and dish/engine systems. Of these
technologies, only parabolic troughs have been deployed in commercial
plants. Nine SEGS plants totaling 354 MW, originally built and operated
by LUZ in California in the 1980s and 1990s, are continuing to operate
today with performance of most of the plants improving over time. At
the end of 2005 SolarGenix completed construction of a 1 MW parabolic
trough plant for Arizona Public Service, the first new commercial CSP
plant to begin operation in more than 15 years. Three additional CSP
plants are currently under construction, PS10 and Andasol One in Spain,
and Nevada Solar One in the U.S. PS10, a 10 MW saturated steam central
receiver plant, and Nevada Solar One, a 64 MW parabolic trough plant,
are expected to begin generating power in 2007. Andasol One, a 50 MW
parabolic trough plant with 6 hours of thermal storage, is expected
begin operating in 2008. Numerous other projects, described later in
this report, are expected to begin construction in 2007. Many other
projects are under various stages of development, primarily in Spain,
northern Africa, and the southwest U. S.
Concentrating solar power offers the
lowest cost option for solar energy today, with expected production
costs of less than 20¢/kWh for early commercial plants with lower costs
expected where additional incentives for CSP systems are available (e.g.
the existing U.S. Federal 30% Investment Tax Credit). As the cost of
electricity from conventional generation technologies continues to rise,
off-takers are becoming increasingly interested in CSP as a viable
alternative to other renewable technology options. Concerns over global
warming and the increasing likelihood of a global carbon constrained
energy market, has further increased this interest.
The Chapter dealing
with solar thermal power plants by Becker et al. in “The future for
Renewable Energy 2: Prospects and Directions” edited by the EUREC
Agency in 2002 (See reference [3.05]),
provides a thorough, up-to-date summary of the status of the technology,
a look at the road to the future, market inroads, and goals for RD&D, as
seen from the standpoint of selected experts of the SolarPACES
community. Chapter 6 of Volume 16 of the American Solar Energy Society
(ASES) Advances in Solar Energy, written by Price and Kearney [3.06]
provides a comprehensive discussion of the current status and future
cost reductions related to parabolic trough technology.
Parabolic troughs
are today considered to be a fully
mature technology, ready for deployment. Early costs for solar-only
plants are expected to be in the range of $0.17-0.20/kWh in sunny
locations where no incentives are offered to reduce costs. In recent
years, the five plants at the Kramer Junction site (SEGS III to VII)
achieved a 30% reduction in operation and maintenance costs, record
annual plant efficiency of 14%, and a daily solar-to-electric efficiency
near 20%, as well as peak efficiencies up to 21.5%. Annual and design
point efficiencies for the current generation of parabolic trough plants
under construction in the U.S. and Spain are expected to be even higher
based on the current generation of heat collection elements being
furnished to the plants by both Solel and Schott. Several commercial
trough projects are being pursued in Spain, the first one under
construction is the 50‑MW Andasol project that will use EUROTrough
collectors and will have a 6-hour molten-salt heat storage system.
Construction of the Andasol project near Granada began in 2006, with
commissioning planned for 2008.
In the United States two commercial
parabolic trough power plant projects are underway. The first is a 1‑MW
organic-rankine-cycle plant built by SolarGenix for Arizona Public
Service. An organic Rankine cycle operates at lower temperature and
efficiency than a steam-Rankine cycle and, potentially, will require
lower operating and maintenance staffing. Construction was completed in
December of 2005 and the plant startup started in January of 2006.
SolarGenix is also nearing completion of a 64‑MW trough project
(conventional hot oil with a Rankine cycle power block) in Boulder City,
Nevada (near Las Vegas) with operation scheduled for Spring of 2007.
Several options for hybrid
solar/fossil plants exist. The integrated solar combined-cycle system (ISCCS)
using trough technology has received much attention the past few years.
Its advantage is lower solar electricity cost and risk in the near term,
but this design’s small annual solar fraction of about 10% is a concern
to some [3.28]. New Energy Algeria (NEAL) selected Abener to build the
first such project at Hassi-R’mel. The project will consist of a 150‑MW
ISCCS with 30 MW solar capacity. Similar project are under
consideration in Egypt, Mexico, Morocco, and India.
Advanced technologies
like Direct Steam Generation (DISS) are under development at the
Plataforma Solar de Almería where research continues to compare direct
steam, using a combination of sensible heat storage and latent heat
storage, with oil based heat transfer fluids. Research on higher
temperature heat transfer fluids and lower cost storage systems [3.17]
are also being pursued.
Linear Fresnel
systems are conceptually simple, using inexpensive, compact optics, and
are being designed to produce saturated steam at 150-360 C with less
than 1 Ha/MW land use. This technology may be suited for integration
into combined cycle recovery boilers; i.e., to replace the bled
extracted steam in regenerative Rankine power cycles or for saturated
steam turbines. The most extensive testing experience at a
prototype-scale is underway at the Liddell power station in Australia
with very compact designs using multi-tower aiming of mirror facets. The
first large proof-of-concept facility will be a commercial project
started by the Solar Heat & Power Company, now Ausra, to integrate 36 MW
of solar into an existing coal-fired power plant. In this hybrid plant,
the 132,500‑m2 reflector field will supply 270°C heat to
replace bled steam in the regenerative feed water heaters of the Rankine
power cycle. Late in 2006, a 300‑m-long array (5 MWth
delivery) was installed at the site. This is the first of three such
arrays planned for this project stage. Connection to the Liddell plant
is expected in 2007.
Power towers
technology, a.k.a. central receiver technology, have completed the
proof-of-concept stage of development and, although less mature than
parabolic trough technology, are on the verge of commercialization. The
most extensive operating experience has been accumulated by several
European pilot projects at the Plataforma Solar de Almería in Spain, and
the 10-MW Solar One and Solar Two facilities in California. After
continuous technology improvement, CRS technology is predicted to reach
efficiencies of 23% at design point and 20% annual performance.
Construction of PS10, the first
commercial power tower, was completed by Solucar at its project site
outside of Sevilla, Spain. The tower system uses a saturated steam
receiver, producing 40 bar/250ºC saturated steam to power a 10‑MW
saturated steam turbine. For cloud transients, the plant incorporates a
thermal-oil storage system with a 20-MWh thermal capacity (1/2 hour at
70% load).
A likely more cost effective
alternative to the saturated steam system developed for PS10 is the
molten salt tower. This approach offers the potential for very low-cost
storage that permits dispatch of solar electricity to meet peak demand
periods and a high capacity factor (~70%). A molten-salt power tower
three times larger than Solar Two is being designed by Sener for
southern Spain. This plant is projected to achieve energy costs similar
to trough technology, but with higher investment risk. Larger increases
in plant size are projected to reduce energy costs significantly,
achieving costs below that of advanced trough technology. Solar Tres, a
17‑‑MW molten-salt tower under development by Sener, is projected to
start construction late in 2007. Another 100‑MW molten-salt plant is
also under consideration in South Africa.
The use of volumetric air receivers
for efficient integration into gas turbine cycles has been promoted in
Europe and Israel using either open or closed loops, intermediate
storage, and hybridization approaches in the SOLGATE, SOLAIR and
Consolar pilot projects, but a commercial project is not yet underway.
Dish/engine
systems are modular units typically between 5 and 25 kW unit size.
Stirling engines have been used most frequently, although other power
converters like Brayton turbines and concentrated PV arrays have been
considered for integration with dish concentrators. The high solar
concentration and operating temperatures of dish/Stirling systems has
enabled them to achieve world-record solar-to-electric conversion
efficiencies of 30%. However, due to their level of development, energy
costs are about twice as high as those of parabolic troughs REF
_Ref68253757 \r \h [3.05].
Dish/engine system development is ongoing in Europe and the USA.
Reliability improvement is a main thrust of ongoing work, where the
deployment and testing of multiple systems enables more rapid progress.
Dish/Stirling systems have traditionally targeted high-value remote
power markets, but industry is increasingly interested in pursuing the
larger, grid-connected markets.
In Europe, Schlaich Bergermann und
Partner have extensively tested several 10-kW systems, based on a
structural dish and the Solo 161 kinematic Stirling engine at the
Plataforma Solar de Almería. Follow-up activities based on the EuroDish
design are being pursued by a European Consortium of SBP, Inabensa,
CIEMAT, DLR and others. EuroDish prototype demonstration units are
currently being operated in Spain, France, Germany, Italy and India. The
EnviroDish project aims to transfer the former Eurodish system into
small series production and deploy systems around the world.
In the USA, Stirling Energy Systems
(SES) is developing a 25-kW dish/Stirling system for utility-scale
markets. Six SES dish/Stirling systems are currently being operated as
a mini power plant at Sandia National Laboratories’ National Solar
Thermal Test Facility in Albuquerque, NM, USA. SES has two power
purchase agreements to install 800 MW of these 25 kW units in
California, USA.
Participation and National
Contributions
Task I is open to all IEA/SolarPACES member.
Participation requires active involvement in an appropriate activity as
described by the scope of Task I. Currently, all SolarPACES member
countries except Switzerland participate in Task I.
Industry involvement is key to the system-level nature of
Task I activities. Involvement can take forms ranging from a
self-funded project lead to contractor status. Current participants are
listed alphabetically by country in REF _Ref34627944 \r \p \h below.
|
Current participants listed alphabetically by country |
|
Algeria |
NEAL |
Sonatrach |
|
Australia:
|
CSIRO
Solar Heat and
Power Pty Ltd |
University of
NSW
University of
Sydney |
|
Brazil:
|
CEPEL |
Petrobras |
|
Egypt |
NREA |
Lotus Solar
Technologies |
|
European
Commission: |
DG RTD |
DG TREN |
|
France:
|
CNRS |
|
|
Germany:
|
DLR
Fichtner Solar
FlagSol
Framatone
MERO |
SBP
Solar
Millennium AG
SOLO Kleinmotoren GMBH
ZSW |
|
Italy |
CESI |
|
|
Israel:
|
Ben Gurion
University
Ormat
Industries
Rotem
Industries |
Solel
WIS |
|
Mexico: |
IIE |
|
|
South Africa |
ESKOM |
|
|
Spain:
|
ACS/COBRA
CIEMAT
INABENSA
GAMESA
IBERINCO |
INITEC
SENER
SERLED
SOLUCAR
TECNICAL |
|
United States: |
Pratt and
Whitney/ Rocketdyne
Electric Power
Research Institute
Industrial Solar Technology
Kearney & Associates
KJC Operating Company
Nexant
(Bechtel Corp.)
Reflective Energies |
Stirling
Energy Systems
SunsLab (Sandia National Labs and National Renewable Energy
Lab)
U.S. Dept. of Energy |
|